Main

July 10, 2007

The Counter-Clockwise Power Meter

I am not an environmentalist—too many kooks, "true believers", charlatans and fascists inhabit that space. However, I am a conservationist; conserving natural resources makes good economic sense, it's aesthetically pleasing, it's charitable to one's neighbors, and it is part of being a good steward of God's gifts to mankind. I know it sounds like I'm playing a semantics game, and I guess in part I am.

It's like feminism. I am a supporter of all things feminine. However, much of what cloaks itself in formal "feminism" looks to me more like female supremacy. Perhaps one might more properly call it "femaleism"? Anyway, I love women, have deep respect for all of the important, powerful, and underappreciated ways they contribute to civil and spiritual life. But I abhor group identity politics and all the ugly intellectual violence it does to individuality.

But I'm way off track, here. My point? No one would ever accuse me of being an environmentalist, probably just on the strength of my political conservatism. However, the idea of "going off the grid" with regard to power consumption—the notion of being a net producer, not user, of energy—and clean energy at that—has always been a little fantasy of mine. My conservative appreciation for what is sometimes called "rugged individualism" has yearned for years for the opportunity to become more and more self-sustaining and less and less dependant upon burning other people's resources in some faraway coal plant.

And so, I find this article, “'Zero-Energy' home plans, in the city or in the sticks" (Matt Edens, Knoxville Metro Pulse: Commentary, 2007) to be really exciting. Here's the lead paragraph:

Living “off the grid” in a home that uses superior efficiency and renewable sources to produce all its electrical needs without plugging into the power grid has long been a goal of environmentalists and conservationists everywhere. Today, that goal is essentially achievable, and you don't have to be a tree-hugger living deep in the forest to do it.

Read on to discover how people are building homes for under $100k that give back to the power grid almost as much energy as they draw from it, all without looking like dorky George Jetson style twinkidomes.

(Thanks to Instapundit for the pointer.)

July 9, 2007

Communicating for a Change

New sermon up at TheoBlog.com: "Make Spiritual Victory a Habit".

It is the first sermon I've done that fully follows the Communicating for a Change model of "ME-WE-GOD-YOU-WE", in that for the first time, after study and prayer, I decided to go all out and actually use the dreaded first-person pronouns in the introduction portion of the message.

I'm posting my outline, for those interested in the method. It wasn't written to be read by others, so you might want to listen to the audio at TheoBlog.com while you read through it, so it'll make more sense.

* * *

TITLE: Make Spiritual Victory a Habit

LESSONS: Matthew 11:28-30; Psalm 51; Heaven and Hell 528

TEXT: Matthew 11:30; Heaven and Hell 533

POINT: Make a mental habit of shunning evil, and the Lord will transform you into a better, happier person.

ME
• Leading a good life sometimes seems hard, but if we just make a habit of repenting then the Lord will do all the heavy lifting.
• “My yoke is easy, and my burden light”
• Love your enemies?

WE
• Sincerely, justly, faithfully?
• Talents? Light?
• By this will they know you… Do they?
• Committed adultery with someone in your heart?
• Ask yourself, “If this big stone building fell and killed me here and now, would I wake in Heaven Tuesday?”

GOD
• Good news: the Lord is Merciful!
• While on earth, he faced every one of these temptations, and more.
• Psalm 51:
• “Have mercy upon me, O God, According to Your lovingkindness; According to the multitude of Your tender mercies, Blot out my transgressions. / Wash me thoroughly from my iniquity, And cleanse me from my sin. // For I acknowledge my transgressions, And my sin is always before me….”
• So what are we to do?
• HH 528:
• IT IS NOT SO HARD TO LEAD A HEAVEN-BOUND LIFE AS PEOPLE THINK IT IS
• Some people believe it is hard to lead the heaven-bound life that is called “spiritual” because they have heard that we need to renounce the world and give up the desires attributed to the body and the flesh and “live spiritually”.
• All they understand by this is spurning worldly interests, especially concerns for money and prestige, going around in constant devout meditation about God, salvation, and eternal life, devoting their lives to prayer, and reading the Word and religious literature. They think this is renouncing the world and living for the spirit and not for the flesh.
• …In fact, people who renounce the world and live for the spirit in this fashion take on a mournful life for themselves, a life that is not open to heavenly joy, since our life does remain with us after death.
• No, if we would accept heaven's life, we need by all means to live in the world and to participate in its duties and affairs. In this way, we accept a spiritual life by means of our moral and civic life; and there is…no other way our spirits can be prepared for heaven. This is because living an inner life and not an outer life at the same time is like living in a house that has no foundation, that gradually either settles or develops gaping cracks or totters until it collapses....

• But how is that an “easy yoke”? A “light burden”??
• The key is HABITS:
• HH 533:
• We can now see that it is not so hard to lead the life of heaven as people think, because it is simply a matter of recognizing, when something attractive comes up that we know is dishonest or unfair, that this is not to be done because it is against the divine commandments. If we get used to thinking like this, and from this familiarity form a habit, then we are gradually united to heaven.
• To the extent that we are united to heaven, the higher levels of our minds are opened, and to the extent that they are opened, we see what is dishonest and unfair; and to the extent that we see this, these qualities can be dispelled. For no evil can be banished until it has been seen. This is a state we can enter because of our freedom, since everyone is free to think in this way.
• However, once the process has started, the Lord works wonders within us, and causes us not only to see evils but to refuse them and eventually to turn away from them. This is the meaning of the Lord's words, “My yoke is easy and my burden light.” (Mat. 11:30)

• WOW.
• Power of habits.
• Developing tastes for foods.
• Eating right.
• Brushing teeth.
• Regular exercise.
• Quitting smoking.
• Speaking of smoking, there’s a dangerous side to habits. HH 533 continues:
• It is important to realize, though, that the difficulty of thinking like this and also of resisting evils increases to the extent that we deliberately do evil things—in fact, to the extent we become used to doing them until ultimately we no longer see them. Then we come to love them and to excuse them to gratify our love and to rationalize them with all kinds of self-deceptions and call them permissible and good. This happens, though, to people who in early adulthood plunge into all kinds of evil without restraint and at the same time at heart reject everything divine.

YOU
• So what are you going to do about this?
• Repent: Examine, Acknowledge, Pray, Live.
• Make repentance a habit.
• Pick something and make shunning it a habit.

WE
• Imagine if every person in the world was making a habit of true repentance, of shunning something.
• Just imagine what your own life will be like.
• We make a habit of thinking, “The Lord said no,” and the Lord moves in us to fight evil and do good.
• He will give us the habit of spiritual victory, and with it, the joy of heaven.
• Truly, his yoke is easy, and his burden light.

May 28, 2007

My Two New Brothers

Well, I just got back in town (Pittsburgh) after spending the weekend out east (Philadelphia). I—along with wife and all four kids—drove out to Bryn Athyn, PA to witness two good friends graduate and then be ordained as priests of the New Church.

Godwin Zatay-Agboga and Ekow Eshun both entered theological school the same year I did. I graduated a year early becuase I took the compressed three-year schedule while they took the standard four-year path. We took the same classes, but not always at the same time. Still, for most of our time at the Academy of the New Church Theological School, we were interacting with each other one way or another.

Both Godwin and Eshun are remarkable men. Each became New Christians by their own paths, in their native Ghana, many years ago. They studied the Word and our religion's theology before coming over to the states for formal training, and in my opinion arrived knowing more about it all than many others who in the past have come into the Theological School after four years at Bryn Athyn College of the New Church. (That's not a strike against the College but a testament to their training in Ghana.)

Anyway, this past Saturday they each graduated, having completed the Master of Divinity (MDiv) program, and on Sunday they were ordained. Not long from now they will both be going back to Ghana to bring New Christianity to all who can benefit from it in their home country.

It was a priviledge and a pleasure to go to school with them, and I am blessed and excited to now call them my brother ministers.

I am also very happy to be home. It's over five hours each direction (almost exactly 300 miles each way), and, while I loved seeing family and friends, as well as the graduation and ordination ceremonies, I am now very worn out and happy to not be sleeping in a strange bed tonight.

Oh, and one other fun part of the trip. My wife and I got to listen to about two thirds of the unabridged audio of The Long Tail. This amazing book has major implications for online (and even traditional) churches that we are exploring as we go through it. Perhaps more on that later. For now, I need to eat dinner. If you don't know about the long tail, here are some links:

September 3, 2006

Form Follows Function

I just read an interesting article:

"The tragic tale of Louis Sullivan"
http://www.suntimes.com/output/entertainment/sho-sunday-sullivan03.html
Kevin Nance
Chicago Sun Times
2006.09.03

The paragraph that brought the piece to my attention was this:

Whatever his sexuality, it's clear he subscribed to a philosophical binary put forth by the 18th century writer Emanuel Swedenborg, who posited types of creativity as male or female. In this way of thinking, the rational, logical aspects of architecture -- which is to say structure -- were masculine; the emotional, intuitive impulses behind Sullivan's ornament were feminine. For him, structural matters were secondary, leading him to produce buildings that were ever more elaborately encrusted with his signature ornament, much of it derived from flowers.

Louis Henri Sullivan was a famous architect. Frank Lloyd Wright was his protege. According to wikipedia, the extremely well-known phrase "form follows function" was first coined by sculptor Horatio Greenough. It was only after Sullivan adopted it that it became a mainstream aphorism. Interesting, given that Sullivan was at least a Swedenborgian, if not also a New Christian.

The references to his sexuality, by the way, stem from a new book that seems to be just one more in a long line of revisionist histories claiming to have spotted yet one more famous crypto-homosexual. I'm not prepared to comment on the merits of this particular case, but experience has taught me to take such claims with more than a grain of salt when they are not backed up by clear documentary evidence.

Anyway, Sullivan's "arch nemesis" apparently, was architect Daniel Hudson Burnham. Now this gets me to wondering, given the "family business" nature of the New Church in America: Burnham is an "old church name", and there are, for that matter, Sullivans in the church as well; is there any connection between the Sullivan and Burnham of the architectural world of a hundred years ago and the modern Sullivan and Burnham families in the church today?

June 7, 2005

Welcome Assembly 2005 Visitors!

Hi there! And welcome, General Church Assembly attendees, to GlennFrazier.com.

Honestly, I didn't expect this site to get mentioned in any way by any one at the 2005 Assembly. But since you're here, might I suggest you also visit another site of mine that is just starting up, TheoBlog.com.

GlennFrazier.com is my personal forum in which I share with fellow bloggers and other readers my opinions on war, politics, philosophy, the arts, and whatever else catches my fancy. TheoBlog.com is a group-blog being designed as a distinctly New Christian e-zine that addresses issues of morality, religion, philosophy, theology and current events from multiple Swedenborgian perspectives. My faith certainly comes out here on GlennFrazier.com, but TheoBlog.com is more self-consciously theological and evangelical.

If you are interested in contributing to the nascent New Christian blogging movement, post a comment here or over in TheoBlog.com.

And enjoy the Assembly!

New Poll on Religious Attitudes

There's an interesting new AP-Ipsos poll on religious attitudes within ten nations that is worth checking out.

Rather than repeat myself, let me just direct you to my post on the topic over at TheoBlog.com.

May 15, 2005

Michael Servetus

Ages and ages ago, I promised to post something about the fascinating theologian/martyr/heretic (it all depends on your own theology) Michael Servetus. Well, I finally did put something up...but on a different site.

Go to TheoBlog.com to read Three Christianities: Calvin, Servetus, Swedenborg. Also, as announced on that site, anyone looking for a far more in-depth comparison of the Christologies of Michael Servetus and Emanuel Swedenborg might want to check out Servetus, Swedenborg And the Nature of God, by Andrew M. T. Dibb.

I still haven't got a translation of the Servetus-Calvin letters, but hold out hope of finishing them some day nonetheless.